Peer Review Process
The International Journal of New Horizons in the Sciences (JIHSCI) employs a double-blind peer review system to ensure the quality and integrity of its publications.
- Double-blind review: The identities of the authors are not disclosed to the reviewers, and the identities of the reviewers are not disclosed to the authors.
- Number of reviewers: Each manuscript is reviewed by at least two independent referees. A third reviewer may be consulted if necessary.
- Initial check: The editor evaluates the submission for compliance with the journal’s aims & scope, author guidelines, and plagiarism screening (iThenticate/Turnitin).
- Evaluation criteria: Originality, methodological soundness, contribution to the literature, accuracy of results, and clarity of writing.
- Timeline: The review process is typically completed within 4–6 weeks.
- Decision process: Based on the reviewers’ reports, the editor makes a decision of “accept,” “revise,” or “reject.”
- Revision: Authors are expected to address the reviewers’ comments and resubmit the revised manuscript. Revised submissions may be sent back to reviewers for further evaluation.
Through this rigorous process, JIHSCI seeks to ensure that all published articles meet high international academic standards and contribute meaningfully to scientific knowledge.
